System
🎯 Objective
To create a consistent review method for submitted cornerstone pages. Whether you’re working solo or with a team, this module gives you a framework for validation, feedback, and enhancement.
🧪 Step-by-Step Approval Workflow
🔹 1. Submission Intake
- Use a form or inbox where creators submit CP drafts
- Require: Page title, category, intro, subcategory list, internal links
✅ Bonus: Include a required “CP Checklist” completion field (see Module 5)
🔹 2. Initial Audit (Scoring)
Apply the CP Scorecard from Module 5 and assign a quality grade:
| Score Range | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | ✅ Approved | Publish as-is |
| 7–8 | 🔧 Minor Fix | Suggest quick edits via notes |
| 5–6 | 🔄 Major Fix | Revision required before approval |
| <5 | ❌ Rejected | Not eligible; rewrite or restructure |
🧠 Option: Use tags like “Needs CTA”, “Weak intro”, “Missing links”
🔹 3. Feedback Loop
Send clear, constructive notes:
- What’s missing?
- Why it matters?
- How to fix it?
Example:
“Your page ‘Outdoor Play’ has strong visuals, but no internal links to subtopics like sports or digital detox. Add those for approval.”
🔹 4. Resubmission Path
Allow creators to revise and resubmit easily. Encourage using Module 4 templates and the CP audit checklist.
🔹 5. Final Approval & Tagging
Once approved, categorize the CP with:
- 🟢 “Live” status
- 📚 Category label (e.g. Kids & Teens)
- 🔑 Keywords for ZM indexing
Store the CP in a central database or content library.
🧰 CP Reviewer Toolkit Includes:
- ✅ CP Scorecard (Module 5)
- 🧱 Template Library (Module 4)
- 🔍 Review Form or Submission Portal
- 📄 Feedback Script Templates
- 🧭 Keyword tagging framework
- 🔁 Update tracking system (for evergreen refreshes)
💡 Tips for Maintaining Quality
- Review CPs every 6–12 months for freshness
- Rotate reviewers to avoid blind spots
- Keep a shared doc with rejected cases and reasons — this teaches creators!